Elephant Shit |
The fact the she basically refused to answer that simple question means she will not accept the results if she is not elected. She obviously is a believer in "heads I win, tails you lose".
She logically can't object if her opponent makes the same election results statement. That would mean that no matter who wins, someone is going to claim election fraud. Of course that is insane.
If Kari Lake really believes she can only lose if there is fraud, why is she campaigning? Why try to convince voters you are the better candidate if you believe the other side is going to manufacture votes? She can't know how many fraudulent votes her opponent could muster.
If Kari Lake really believes the other side is going to produce fraudulent votes, wouldn't she be smart to tell us how the fraud will be committed so it can be prevented? Or maybe manufacture some fraudulent votes for herself?
So extending Kari Lake's philosophy she believes both candidates will attempt to commit fraud and the winner will be the candidate that was the better fraudster.
Kari Lake is wrong and should not be elected. All candidates should commit to accepting the results of elections and to doing their part to make sure that elections are fair and accurate.